Life
Share
1st June 2017
05:42pm BST
In order to create the look, the kids had temporary body paint stenciled on their arms with all sorts of designs.
The show asked the question:
"Should parents be encouraging tattoos for their children at such a young age, even if they are only temporary?"People were not impressed with the parent's decision with some people saying it was "disgusting".
Make the child want a tattoo for real later in life they might regret it later on
— Sharon hurley (@Shazzer2933) June 1, 2017
Child abuse. Permanently ruining her child's skin. A child agreeing at that age means nothing. Should be prosecuted
— X (@stefaniejjj) June 1, 2017
NO ! Absolute. Step too far.
— Leigh Trace Cooper (@TrueBlueLeigh) June 1, 2017
disgusting! Those poor children being shown the rough side of life!
— anna shakalis (@anniemanc) June 1, 2017
Some others weren't as offended.the school should report to child services the mother is a bad mother should loose her child
— david james (@davidthor78) June 1, 2017
It's been around for years! Used to be called transfers and caused no harm or lasting issues, unless you count getting ink on your duvet!
— The Truth Detective (@detective_truth) June 1, 2017
Bit of fun. No different from kids having face painting or tan and make up for dance competitions etc. Two lovely kids.
— Lee Montgomery (@leehotmess) June 1, 2017
Kids have been getting henna ones on the holiday piers for years bit of fun for kids much worse going on in the world lighten up fgs
— Vikki Leigh Phillips (@VikkiLeighPhil1) June 1, 2017
Definitely, I have tattoos on my back and foot. If my children wanted to have one it's washable, don't see the harm it's art
— Dawn thomson (@DawnTommo19) June 1, 2017
Let children be children! There's nothing wrong with it. Better having a temporary one than having a real one later in life & regretting it
— emily summerson (@tallulah1177) June 1, 2017
Explore more on these topics:
Life
Life
Life
Life
Life
Life
