Is there anything better than a bag of Monster Munch? Probably yes but they did win world's best crisp in Richard Osman's Twitter "World Cup of Crisps" last year.
https://twitter.com/richardosman/status/714554585306808321?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
So yeah, we fucking love Monster Munch, but now it's starting to look like we might have been fundamentally wrong about a very important part of our favourite corn snacks this entire time – their shape.
Monster Munch are little monster claws, right? That's just what they are. We've always thought that, and there's no reason to think any different, yeah?
WRONG!
(Maybe)
This tweet from
@TheSeshLad is blowing people's minds, by saying that they're not claws, they're actually little monsters with big arms and heads.
https://twitter.com/TheSeshLad/status/818884342479015937
People are pretty shaken up by it.
https://twitter.com/razackray/status/818952893923520512
https://twitter.com/martinaldo10/status/819172860849717250
https://twitter.com/minnieb23/status/819148027998994432
You're probably thinking right now that this is just a coincidence. They do look like little monsters, but that doesn't mean they're not still meant to be claws. Nothing to worry about, right?
WRONG AGAIN!
(Maybe)
See, when you look at the Wikipedia page for Monster Munch, it says THIS:
That's right, according to Wikipedia: "Monster Munch are a baked corn snack aimed at children that are shaped like an upside down monster with long arms".
This shit just got real (also, fuck you Wikipedia with your "aimed at children" rubbish, I am a grown adult and I will eat Monster Munch whenever I please).
However, on the bags themselves, the pictures of the crisps all look like they're claw-way up, though it doesn't actually say on them what shape they're meant to be. WHAT IS THE TRUTH?
So what's the answer? Are they claws? Are they little monsters?
We're also reaching out to Walkers themselves to see if they can shed any light on this, the biggest story of 2017 so far.
