
Fashion

Share
26th May 2021
11:43am BST

A judge ruled that the similarity in the redesign intended to cause an association with Hendrick's brand.
In a written judgement, Lord Clark said: "The defenders' customers were aware that well-known products can be purchased in the defenders' supermarkets often at discounted prices in comparison to other retailers."
He did note, however, that Lidl did not have any "branded spirits listed as products nationally", and that the average customer would be familiar with Lidl's Hampstead gin, and may not expect to find brands like Hendrick's in store.
Lord Clark ruled that there is a "sufficient basis to argue visual and conceptual similarity between the mark and the sign."
He added that the similarity in bottle shape and colour may lead to the "greater likelihood of confusion". He stressed that the "Hendrick's mark relied upon is quite distinctive and recognised on the market."
He concluded that there was "sufficient material" to infer that there was a "deliberate alteration" of the Hampstead product to "seek to cause at least an association with Hendrick's."
A spokesperson from Lidl said: "We note the court's decision and have closely adhered to the requirements outlined within the ruling.
Explore more on these topics:

Health
health